From: Andy Polyakov <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:00:18 +0200
>> We don't have enough registers to unroll it by another factor, > > aes01 %key0,%reg0,%reg1,%reg2 > aes23 %key1,%reg0,%reg1,%reg1 <<< 1, not 3 > aes01 %key2,%reg2,%reg1,%reg0 > aes23 %key4,%reg2,%reg1,%reg1 > > allows for 4x interleave up to 192-bit, right? 3*4+13*4=64? Or did I > get it wrong? Or would 3-register arrangement like above not work? Thanks for your suggestions I'll look into this. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
