On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Ben Laurie <b...@links.org> wrote: > On 20 June 2013 21:46, Jeff Mendoza (MS OPEN TECH) > <jemen...@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto: > owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] > >> On Behalf Of Piotr Sikora > >> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 10:41 AM > >> To: openssl-dev@openssl.org > >> Subject: Re: [Patch] ALPN Implementation for OpenSSL > >> > >> We simply cannot drop support for NPN (i.e. SPDY) just to add support > for > >> ALPN. > > > > The idea is to have the choice as a ./config option. The default will > stay as NPN, as to not disrupt anyone. I don't have this in the patch yet. > > That doesn't make any sense. How would a server serve both NPN and ALPN?
Think of all the distributions that package OpenSSL. What should they choose?
