On 22 June 2013 23:06, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Saturday 22 June 2013 15:07:49 Ben Laurie wrote: >> On 22 June 2013 19:04, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> > On Wednesday 19 June 2013 07:21:39 Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> On 18 June 2013 22:35, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> > On Tuesday 18 June 2013 07:37:55 Richard Weinberger wrote: >> >> >> While building openssl-1.0.1e I noticed that the parallel build >> >> >> is broken. >> >> > >> >> > yes, it's pretty much always been broken >> >> > >> >> >> I found this patch on the net: >> >> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-libs/open >> >> >> ssl /fi les/openssl-1.0.1-parallel-build.patch With it applied >> >> >> openssl builds fine in parallel. >> >> > >> >> > heh, you've found me! the referenced ticket says it's been merged, >> >> > but it doesn't seem that way (at least for the latest branch). >> >> >> >> You are right it hasn't been merged. One problem with it is it doesn't >> >> work with BSD make (BSD make doesn't understand | in dependencies). >> > >> > true, but the patch posted to RT didn't include that, and that usage >> > shows up only twice in the current Gentoo patch. plenty of the other >> > parts can be merged now so it's not nearly as terrible. >> > >> > i wonder if the | can be written instead like: >> > lib: >> > $(MAKE) subdirs >> > $(MAKE) $(LIB) >> > @touch lib >> > $(LIB): $(LIBOBJ) >> > ... >> >> I don't know, but FWIW, I've also been working on -j stuff, but using >> the mk1mf script (see the GitConfigure and GitMake scripts in master >> and 1.0.2). My version is at least twice as fast as yours - on my >> machine :-) > > to be fair, i was just trying to make it work rather than rewrite things > > unfortunately mk1mf is a perl script, and i've been doing my damnedest to make > sure perl isn't a requirement to build a base system. we've been able to > avoid this so far w/openssl ...
Well, you need perl to run Configure already, so presumably you do that in advance. You could do the same with mk1mf. > >> Possibly the right answer is to simply move to a single makefile... > > that might work > -mike ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
