Oops I meant 1.0.1f not 1.0.0l but I don't mind doing both. My work is currently against 1.0.1e.
Jonathan > On January 21, 2014 at 3:04 AM "jonat...@buhacoff.net" <jonat...@buhacoff.net> > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, in my application I have a need for using PBKDF2 and an iteration > count > 1 and it's not possible to specify either of these on the enc command > line as of 1.0.1e. > > I found an old thread from 2008 where Marek Marcola provided an example of how > to use the PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC_SHA1 function: > http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-users@openssl.org/msg54143.html > > I added two arguments to the enc command: > > -pbkdf2 use PBKDF2 > -c iteration count (default 1) > > Using -c by itself specifies an iteration count for EVP_BytesToKey, and using > -c > together with -pbkdf2 specifies an iteration count for PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC. When > using -pbkdf2, the digest selected by -md is used. > > Anyone using the enc command without the new options would not be affected. > > I would like to submit the patch. I would I re-do it against 1.0.0l before > submitting. > > Does this look ok? > > Jonathan ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
