I'm not a dev or even a real FIPSian, but I'll take a stab:
The commit itself says branch_0_9_8_stable, and see it in 0.9.8 v and later. But I don't think it does any good there, because you don't want to build a FIPS module from a normal tarball. (It's not validated, so it's no better and perhaps worse than a plain non-FIPS library.) There is one release on the website of fips-1.2 after 2012-apr-15, 1.2.4, which clearly does not have the change (VC-32.pl contents and timestamp unchanged). All of the fips-2.0* tarballs are well after 2012-apr and do add /fixed, but not exactly this way. They put it in a different place that looks to have the same result, but I don't have actual FIPS builds to verify. From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Parag Doke Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 08:37 To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: *** Spam *** Which OpenSSL version picked up check-in 22392? Hello All. I'm new to this list. Just wanted to ask which OpenSSL version picked up check-in 22392 ? Here is the change I'm interested in: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=22392 Context: Avoid rebasing dll so that the fingerprint mismatch issue does not show up. The discussion is on this link: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.openssl.devel/18309 I looked at the code for OpenSSL 1.0.1e and 1.0.1f, both did not have this change. Was it obsoleted by some other subsequent change ? Thanks in advance, Parag Doke Save paper, save trees. Do not print emails/documents unless absolutely necessary.
