On Sat, Mar 15, 2014, Sunil wrote: > I had some issues when compiling without the "no-asm" option; this can > probably be fixed with configuring the right paths. I haven't dug into > getting the performance gain since I was focused on resolving the bad > record mac error. If it seems related to the issue, then I can work on > getting it compiled without the "no-asm" option. > > Here is the output from cl: > > Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 17.00.51106.1 for x86 >
That's odd. I have exactly the same version and don't have any problems with s_server/s_client even with no-asm. The only possible difference is I'm using the latest 1.0.1 snapshot but that shouldn't matter. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
