For the record, I have reviewed Adam's versions of the code before these were posted here, and Adam has resolved the problems that I pointed out. As of the latest patch, I think the code is suitable for inclusion in OpenSSL. The final missing part is support that makes it easy to build with or without this NIST P-256 implementation, depending on whether the target platform supports it, similar to the "enable-ec_nistp_64_gcc_128" config option for the 64-bit optimized implementations using type __uint128_t. (The current patch unconditionally links in the new files, but we may not even be able to process the new assembler files.)
Also, it would be nice to have Shay review our changes to his contribution (the March 11 "patch.bz2" as further changed by the April 10 "patch") to make sure that while fixing the problems we found, we didn't do unwanted changes. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
