On 27 May 2014, at 10:01, Krzysztof Kwiatkowski <krzys...@leeds.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 09:18 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: >>> Please do update it. >> I guess that patch should be against the master branch, right? >> (the current patch doesn't apply there...) >> > That what I was thinking about. Wouldn't it be less work to apply my > patch to master and then apply patch for IPv6 (as it cleanly applies > right now)? In such case I won't need to change my patch later. Makes sense. Apply your patch... Let me know once it is in. Looking at your patch: Wouldn't it make sense to allow setting the local port number as well? You could use -bind host:port similar to -connect host:port instead of -localip arg You could also call bind() in any case. Just initialise the address and port number to 0. Best regards Michael > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org > Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
