On 13 June 2014 11:12, Hubert Kario <[email protected]> wrote: > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Richard Moore" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Thursday, June 12, 2014 11:13:09 PM > *Subject: *Re: Minor fixes to openssl ocsp > > > On 12 June 2014 17:34, Hubert Kario <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > I put a couple of fixes as pull requests into github, but haven't seen >> any >> > movement (eg. reviews). In case it's simply because no one noticed >> here's a >> > link: >> > >> > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pulls/richmoore >> >> Both look good. Could you also add description of -header to man page? >> > > I think that's a good idea, but I'd rather do it as a commit that resolved > that by syncing up the man page properly. I've not checked the code but I > doubt that -header is the only undocumented option. If fixing the man page > is a requirement to get this merged is a requirement then yes, I'll do it, > but I'd rather minimise the amount of times I have to mess around with pod > files. > > > I know that the man pages are missing description of many options. The > point is that at least we can keep them from getting worse. > Then the occasional additional fix will be able to bring them closer to > the "100% documented", not bring them back to the "90% documented". > > Perhaps I wasn't clear. I'm saying that once these have gone through, *I* will spend the time to make sure the ocsp man page covers 100% of the available options as a follow up commit.
Rich.
