On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 06:15:28PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> On 12 June 2014 23:15, Matt Caswell <m...@openssl.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/06/14 22:43, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:26:56PM +0200, Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> >>
> >>> Patch applied:
> >>> https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=abfb989fe0b749ad61f1aa4cdb0ea4f952fc13e0
> >>>
> >>> Many thanks for your contribution.
> >>>
> >>> Matt
> >>
> >> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/ssl/ssl_ciph.c.diff?r1=1.38;r2=1.39
> >>
> >> Again no attribution in problem report and commit. Claiming
> >> independent discovery is not going to be credible.
> >
> > The commit *is* attributed. The author is listed as Kurt Cancemi - this
> > is as it is attributed in the patch supplied in the problem report.
>
> I presume he meant in the OpenBSD repo...
>
> Kurt does not appear to be attributed there:
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libssl/src/ssl/ssl_ciph.c?rev=1.39.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
You care confusing the matter. Kurt already expained he got the fix
from OpenBSD. After that explanation, the OpenSSL repo was fixed to
contain the attribution.
-Otto
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
