On Sat, Jun 28, 2014, Jeremy Farrell wrote:

> > From: Hanno Böck [mailto:ha...@hboeck.de]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 10:36 PM
> > 
> > On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:05:21 +0200
> > Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote:
> > 
> > > If you make such a patch, I might disable SSLv3 support in Debian,
> > > but that's unlikely to make it in jessie.
> > 
> > The openssl configure script already has a disable-ssl3 option.
> > 
> > I experimented with it a while back and it didn't have any impact. I'm
> > also running my servers without sslv3 (although the openssl there still
> > supports it, I just disable it in the software configurations).
> 
> I had a quick play with building 1.0.1g with both SSLv2 and SSLv3 disabled a 
> couple of weeks ago. There are unfortunate effects in the openssl application 
> at least, where some logic appears not to have been updated for TLS. If both 
> SSLv2 and SSLv3 are disabled, some commands are removed. For example the 
> 'ciphers' command is removed, presumably on the basis that if you don't have 
> SSLv2 or SSLv3 then you can't have any interest in cipher suites. Didn't have 
> time to pursue it further at the time, but was concerned there might be other 
> less obvious problems.
> 
> It looks like there is some work to do to make this clean across the full 
> project.

Looks like the logic in ciphers and progs.pl is rather ancient. I've just
updated it so ciphers, s_client and s_server now work with no-ssl2 no-ssl3 I'd
be interested to know if anyone sees any other side effects.

Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to