On 1 July 2014 22:09, Mike Bland <mbl...@acm.org> wrote: > Yeah, the portability angle is why I'm trying to move forward > carefully. That said, isn't GNU Make everywhere these days? Couldn't > we eliminate a lot of complexity by relying on its include syntax (and > other treats)? I'm still a n00b on this scene, so I don't aim to > offend anyone, but it's an honest, if naive question. >
nmake is the make generally used by windows developers. There are also more modern tools like cmake that will generate the build files for a wide range of systems. Rich.
