> i don't think that's really true. else, why is autoconf & friends relying on > a > shell and not perl ? those see way more distribution than openssl.
Last I looked, autoconf doesn't use anything that really wasn't in Version 7 Bourne shell. In my comment, I deliberately used the term "posix shell" But to my mind, the question is moot, since post-1.0.2 we'll almost definitely have c_rehash builtin to the openssl command. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
