On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Andy Polyakov via RT <r...@openssl.org> wrote: > Or in other words if we set up for > such quest, then we should make corresponding cases with all compiler > developers/manufacturers.
Agreed. >> - The cost is negligible. (And it's lower for us than library clients: >> They have no way of knowing what registers have been used, so they >> would need to do the equivalent of OPENSSL_wipe_cpu.) > > Even would be case for compiler-generated code. Agreed. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
