On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 02:09:03AM -0400, Salz, Rich wrote: > > > > AES 128 is worth supporting. > > > > Not for me; doing this strictly for fun. > > Sure, I understand that. > > We're unlikely to incorporate the patch without "finishing" it and > doing AES 128. Nobody said it had to be you :) > > It will take awhile anyway, and it won't show up in 1.0.2 >
Rich: You might want to toggle off base64 encoding on your emails. Some mail clients choke on it as do list aggregators (e.g. http://marc.info/?l=openssl-dev&m=141387182603109&w=2). I long ago trained myself to read base64 while building up an immunity to iocaine powder but others might have trouble. --mancha
pgp9aQHfUMjfz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
