On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Andy Polyakov via RT <[email protected]> wrote:
> I actually have improved implementation (well, it's not actually a *lot*
> better, can't be made a *lot* better because of aesenclast latency, but
> it should get better on processors with lower latency) for all key
> lengths.

Awesome! :)

> Bottom line is that specific submission is dismissed, and as there is
> interest I can proceed committing my code.

Thanks,

David


______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [email protected]
Automated List Manager                           [email protected]

Reply via email to