On 26 Oct 2014 22:58, Andy Polyakov wrote: > > I would go with option 2. and detect the ARM architecture that we are > > compiling for in the configure phase and compile for it. > > As mentioned in another message question was not about removing run-time > switch as concept, but about limiting it to ARMv>=7 targets.
sounds reasonable for >=armv7 to do runtime detection, and for <=armv6 to be compiled for the specific target. <=armv5 is a deadish category (some still exist and see updates, but few), and really armv6 is only viable because of things like the raspberry pi. -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
