On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 02:02:35PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > I'd recommend doing all this but with such correction that the new > result will not break API/ABI backwards compatibility to OpenSSL 1.0.x > so it can be applied in some future 1.0.x branch. > > Basically things should not be removed but only added and the new name > (TLS_method()) should be #define of SSLv23_method() and not the other > way around. Then in 1.x branch the legacy things might be removed if > appropriate.
I don't think we'll have an other 1.0.x other than 1.0.2, so this would be an 1.1 thing. There would be no need to keep the SSLv23_method() as symbol in the library. Kurt ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
