On 27/01/15 12:02, [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > Quick note about this (or could you refer me to the discussion that I > missed). Although I have no problems with explicitly patented code being > included with OpenSSL, shouldn't the default for such code be "off" with an > explicit "enable-ocb"?
Why? We have an explicit licence enabling its use - so why shouldn't it be on? Matt _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
