On 02/03/15 01:54, Erik Forsberg wrote: > This patch fixes the issue. > I had a similar fix, but yours is more complete. > Thanks. > > Another thought. As I looked at this multiblock code I realize it > will have some impact on memory usage. Thinking it might be good > to have an option to disable the function at runtime so one can chose > between memory savings and performance. Particularly in the main > branch where these OPENSS_NO_XXX compile time options are going away ?
You can already use OPENSSL_SMALL_FOOTPRINT for this purpose. Matt _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
