> 1) They are "not" two different platforms, merely same command executed for 2 > different versions of openssl.. please see attachment 1 below. It is possible > that 1.0.2a was configured use config where openssl picked defaults and > 0.9.8g was build using "./Configure solaris-x86-cc"
Attachment 1 indicates that you execute on SPARC. At the same time you keep mentioning configuration for solaris-x86-cc. In normal situation it's interpreted as two platforms. > 2) I rebuilt 1.0.2a using "./Configure solaris-x86-cc" please see attachment > 2 showing " platform: solaris-x86-cc " (which I had done before as well)... > and executed the program, resulting in same ssl errors on server side (05-19 > 09:48:44.427 SSLERR: SSL_connect/accept problem > error:1408F119:SSL > routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:decryption failed or bad record), and on client side > (05-19 09:48:44.444 SSLERR: SSL_connect > error:140943FC:SSL > routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert bad record mac) If you force x86 configuration on SPARC, no guarantees can be provided. Even if it happens to work in some particular case. It just makes no sense to spend time thinking about it. _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
