On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 04:39:36PM +0000, Zooko Wilcox-OHearn via RT wrote: > > One of the coreutils maintainers suggested that we should ask OpenSSL > to add BLAKE2, because coreutils itself will probably just use a > portable C implementation, but it would use an optimized > implementation if openssl provided it. Here's that thread: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2015-06/msg00011.html
So which "blake2" are we talking about? I understand that there are many variations. Anyway, I think we should add it. Kurt _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
