On Sun Jun 21 19:00:55 2015, giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com wrote:
> Yet another version after some refactorings that landed in master.
>
> Please, pretty please, with sugar on top, could anyone review this code
> so that it can get merged?
>
> It's becoming a difficult exercise to keep track of upstream changes and
> adapt the patch every single time...
>

I'm currently looking at the OpenSSL PSK code. I'll look into incopoorating
your changes (in a modified form) as part of that so there is no need to keep
it up to date with the changing master branch.

I hope to revise the PSK code and make it more flexible so it can support
{RSA,DH,ECDH}+PSK more cleanly.

FYI, I can tell you the cause of the GCM crash: the cipher structure isn't set
up correctly in your patch, it needs to use SSL_AEAD not SSL_SHA256 (compare it
with other GCM entries).

Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org

_______________________________________________
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Reply via email to