On 31/07/15 19:19, Brian Smith wrote: > > Also, I question the need for people to sign a CLA to contribute to OpenSSL. > OpenSSL has been very successful for decades without a CLA requirement. Lots > of other projects are extremely successful without a CLA. A CLA seems > unnecessary.
More importantly in my mind, I find it difficult to imagine at this point that OpenSSL will verifiably be able to obtain a CLA from every person who has *ever* contributed to OpenSSL code. But I agree with others that if you can somehow manage it, then choosing something (L)GPLv2 compatible would be vastly better. Jifl -- eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571 Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071. ------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------ Opinions==mine _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
