On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 09:53 Alessandro Ghedini <alessan...@ghedini.me> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:55:43am +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > > Thanks! We have several cross-compile builds running on Cisco's build > farm. > > The more the merrier. I am sure ARM would be appreciated. > > Does this mean that you are not oging to enable Travis CI? If anything this > buildfarm didn't seem to catch the 25efcb44 build failure. Additionally > Travis > automatically builds pull requests submitted on GitHUb, in order to give > immediate feedback to submitter and reviewer. > > So I think it still makes sense to have Travis alongside this Cisco > buildfarm > (as you said, the more the merrier), but if you don't agree then both #63 > and > #373 pull requests can be closed (if anything, two less open PRs...). > I've just +1'ed #373 - if another OpenSSL dev will also do that, I'll push it...
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
