On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:28:05AM +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > I'm going to look into the failures of other branches as well, but that will > probably involve just disabling various builds that are just not supported > (e.g. clang and mingw debug).
I opened the following PR to fix the builds in the 1.0.2 branch: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/428 The changes include: - The email address fix as in master. - Disabled mingw debug builds (as previously discussed, these are not gonna be fixed in the stable branches). - Added a new target debug-linu-x86_64-clang, to make the linux clang debug build work. - Added a fix for other bogus GCC warnings similar to the one fixed in master (but in a different file). I renamed all instances of the "index" variable to "ind" for consistency. Now the 1.0.2 branch is all green as well. I haven't looked at 1.0.1 yet, and for 0.9.8 we might want to just disable mingw builds completely, since they don't seem to work at all. > I'm also working into adding support for newer compilers like gcc-5 and > clang-3.8. This could allow us to build with address sanitizer and other > niceties. I've opened the following PR to add support for GCC v5 and address sanitizer (not sure if we want valgrind as well...): https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/429 I think we can just use that instead of adding support for v4.7, v4.8 and v4.9. I haven't looked into newer clang versions yet. Cheers
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
