--On Friday, November 20, 2015 9:47 PM +0100 Richard Levitte
<levi...@openssl.org> wrote:
I would like to point out that the GNU project talks about the Apache
v2 license in positive terms:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
When dealing with the GPLv3, yes. However, it clearly notes the
incompatibility with the GPLv2. Moving to a license that does not resolve
the GPLv2 compatibility problem really doesn't help. I guess the
overwhelming feedback from the community that the new license really needs
to be GPLv2 compatible just went in one eye and out the other, so to speak.
Re: Rich, yes removing the advertising clause is helpful, etc. Just move
to plain BSD/MIT license then, and resolve all the issues.
Or, does the community input that was received, that was consistently
pointing out that a non-GPLv2 compatible license does not solve the
fundamental problems with the current license going to continue to be
blatantly ignored?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
_______________________________________________
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
