On 11/24/2015 05:06 AM, Pascal Cuoq via RT wrote:
> This issue is similar in nature to 4151 
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg40950.html ): it is 
> about a dangling pointer being used, but not used for dereferencing, so it's 
> not a memory error. The dangling pointer is used in a comparison.
>
> The function int_thread_del_item can reach the point were it calls 
> “lh_ERR_STATE_free(int_thread_hash);” with hash == int_thread_hash. That 
> attached patch prints a message like “hash == int_thread_hash == 0xb2a6d0” 
> when this happens. Just after the call to lh_ERR_STATE_free, both hash and 
> int_thread_hash contain dangling pointers. The variable int_thread_hash is 
> immediately set to NULL.
>
> The problem that I am reporting is that just afterwards, &hash is passed to 
> the function int_thread_release:
>
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/079a1a9014b89661f0a612a5a9724ad9c77f21a3/crypto/err/err.c#L412
>
>

Note that per J.2 of C99 (n1256.pdf page 503, document-internal
numbering), using the value of a pointer that refers to space
deallocated by a call to free is undefined behavior, even for just
comparison.  (This is covered in passing at
http://web.torek.net/torek/c/numbers2.html)

-Ben


_______________________________________________
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Reply via email to