On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 07:54:35PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Also, if you want to use atomics we really want the C11 / C++11 > memory model which prevents certain important optimazations.
Right, because compilers can reorder some operations. But we've been living with this pre-C11 for decades. We can't yet require C11 (though I'd sure like to). BTW, there's this: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2015/05/01/bringing-clang-to-windows.aspx which, IIUC means we can get C11 on Windows with MSVC with a clang frontend. So maybe Windows is a non-issue, and maybe C11 is a non-issue. Though I'm sure there's platforms where OpenSSL can't expect C11 yet, so I suspect we're stuck with C90+ for a while. Nico -- _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
