On 1/14/16, 16:51 , "openssl-dev on behalf of Dr. Stephen Henson"
<openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org on behalf of st...@openssl.org> wrote:

>On Thu, Jan 14, 2016, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
>> Okay, how about this.  First, remove the NOTES subhead.  Add this to
>>the end of the first paragraph:
>> 
>>      This program does not hash the input data and requires the input data
>>      to be of the proper size, and must not be greater than the size of
>>      the public key field or modulus.  See dgst(1) for a unified
>>      Interace.
>> 
>
>The comment about the public key field or modulus is only true for some
>public
>key algorithms (e.g. RSA).

Public key modulus would be true for RSA and DSA. Field would be true for
ECDSA (and I daresay EdDSA). What other signatures do we have?

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Reply via email to