On Jan 16 19:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 07:42:50PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jan 16 19:37, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Jan 14 15:44, Richard Levitte wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > > > > > OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 2 (alpha) > > > > =========================================== > > > > > > I tried to build this for Cygwin and got some problems. > > > [...] > > > The attached patchset fixes all of the above. With this, > > > openssl-1.1.0-pre2 builds fine for Cygwin. > > > > I added another patch to this mail which sets the default CPU for 32 bit > > Cygwin builds to i686, as outlined in another mail. Cygwin won't run on > > older CPUs anyway. The path depends on the 2nd patch from my previous > > mail. > > Is gcc configure to only produce i686 code on cygwin, and so can > we maybe drop the -march instead?
Oh yes, indeed. Sorry I missed that :} Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
