From: Richard Levitte <levi...@openssl.org> > sms> Configuring for vms-alpha > sms> %DCL-W-MAXPARM, too many parameters - reenter command with fewer > parameters > sms> \2\ > > Yeah, that one is entirely harmless (and known).
Ok. > sms> Apparently, the test for "--prefix" is case-sensitive, and DCL can't > sms> be trusted. Quotation helps: > sms> > sms> ALP $ @ config.com > "--prefix=ALP$DKC100:[UTILITY.SOURCE.OPENSSL.1_1_0-pre3]" > sms> [...] > > You're running with the extended parsing style, aren't you? I always > forget that possibility ... Of course. Isn't everyone? > sms> Installation fails, however: > sms> > sms> ALP $ mms install > sms> > sms> *** Installing development files > sms> CREATE/DIR ossl_installroot:[include.openssl] > sms> COPY/PROT=W:R openssl:*.h ossl_installroot:[include.openssl] > sms> %COPY-F-OPENIN, error opening openssl:*.h as input > sms> -RMS-F-FNM, error in file name > sms> %MMS-F-ABORT, For target INSTALL_DEV, CLI returned abort status: > %X1067109C. > sms> ALP $ > sms> > sms> I haven't yet looked into that one. > > When looking into it, I suggest you do so with > mms/macro="NODEBUG=""""", that'll display the temporary logicals that > get created under the hood. (fair warning, it's not the most elegant > coding) I'll see if I can work up some ambition. Before it died, the installation procedure seemed to create a new/strange/bad directory for the header files: Directory ALP$DKC100:[UTILITY.SOURCE.OPENSSL.1_1_0-pre3.include.openssl] aes.h;1 11 15-FEB-2016 20:33:03.39 (RWED,RWED,RE,R) [...] The [.openssl] subdirectory looks new (and undesirable). (And, nothing beyond the header files got installed.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street (+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
