On Pá, 2016-02-19 at 11:31 +0000, Matt Caswell wrote:
> So it seems that for chil there may possibly be some rare use (but
> even
> the most recent evidence is 4 years old). However the OpenSSL dev
> team
> do not have access to this hardware to maintain the engine and (as
> noted
> above) this is currently not building in 1.1.0.
>
> In both cases I would like to remove these engines from 1.1.0. I'd
> like
> to hear from the community if there is any active use of these. One
> option if there is found to be some small scale use is to spin out
> the
> engine into a separately managed repo (as has happened recently with
> the
> GOST engine).
>
> If I don't hear from anyone I will remove these.
As far as I know there are some customers using the Chil engine with
RHEL (openssl-1.0.1).
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
(You'll never know whether the road is wrong though.)
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
