On 3/7/16, 11:05 , "openssl-dev on behalf of Andy Polyakov" <openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org on behalf of ap...@openssl.org> wrote:
>> Try >> $ machine >> >> Apparently "arch" is not only old (the latest release was in July >>2010), but it does not differentiate between Intel-32 and Intel-64. >> >> On my own Mac (proven to be 64-bit :) arch returns "i386", machine >>returns "x86_64h". > >And I get i486 (sic!) on proven to be 64-bit Mac. Yes another proof that we cannot rely on “arch” on the newer Mac OS X boxes. >As already mentioned, >these things has changed recently (all right, at some point), and for >this reason something that worked earlier and keeps working in the same >way should be preferable. Or at least one should account for the fact >that things has changed. I agree. But don’t know how to accomplish that. >What's h after x86_64h anyway? Sorry, I don’t have the slightest idea. :-(
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
