Yes, that diff fixes the problem, thank you! (Hope to see it in Github :) On 3/14/16, 11:45, "openssl-dev on behalf of Viktor Dukhovni" <openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org on behalf of openssl-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 03:28:13PM +0000, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL >wrote: >> install ./doc/crypto/EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA.pod -> >>/Users/ur20980/share/man/man3/EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA.3 >> >> IO::File=IO(0x7feb8c8029c0) around line 62: Unterminated B<...> sequence >> POD document had syntax errors at /opt/local/bin/pod2man line 68. > >Try: > >diff --git a/doc/crypto/EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA.pod >b/doc/crypto/EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA.pod >index de31bc1..c7fd8e9 100644 >--- a/doc/crypto/EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA.pod >+++ b/doc/crypto/EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA.pod >@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ an RSA key will return B<EVP_PKEY_RSA>. > EVP_PKEY_id() returns the actual OID associated with B<pkey>. >Historically keys > using the same algorithm could use different OIDs. For example an RSA >key could > use the OIDs corresponding to the NIDs B<NID_rsaEncryption> (equivalent >to >-B<EVP_PKEY_RSA) or B<NID_rsa> (equivalent to B<EVP_PKEY_RSA2>). The use >of >+B<EVP_PKEY_RSA>) or B<NID_rsa> (equivalent to B<EVP_PKEY_RSA2>). The use >of > alternative non-standard OIDs is now rare so B<EVP_PKEY_RSA2> et al are >not > often seen in practice. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
