On Wednesday 16 March 2016 20:40:42 Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > On Mar 16, 2016, at 6:44 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <openssl- [email protected]> wrote: > >> Was the SSL_get_version() behavior changed on purpose in the Beta 1 > >> release? This function used to return "TLSv1" when TLS v1.0 was > >> used > >> while it is now in Beta 1 returning "TLSv1.0" for that case. > > > > I missed this change in the review. Sorry about that. It should > > perhaps be reverted for beta2. The reported version string for > > TLS 1.0 has been "TLSv1" since support for "TLS 1.0" was introduced. > > It should likely stay that way. > > I think it is reasonable to preserve the backwards compatible "TLSv1" > for the string protocol version, but do we also need to preserve the > "TLSv1.0" in ciphers(1) output? If so, the code needs an exception > that can otherwise be avoided.
I'd say that ciphers(1) is directed more at human users than on applications, I don't think changing it there would be a problem. -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
