In message <cah8yc8mkpw+rex0ka8kcj_oggydvrlgyaxtdfvri1vasx-u...@mail.gmail.com> on Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:16:59 -0400, Jeffrey Walton <noloa...@gmail.com> said:
noloader> > Why do you want to be able to build on an OS released in 2012 with a noloader> > C89-only compiler? I'm probably missing something, but I'm struggling to noloader> > understand the point of this. noloader> noloader> I'm not sure what the reason are. But for me, as long as its a claim noloader> or a requirement, it gets tested to ensure goals are being met. An ANSI compiler is not strict requirement, but rather a minimum. That means we need to refrain from using more modern language features such as // comments, lambda functions, try/except/failure and the like. Obviously, we need to handle strict ANSI a bit better. Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
