In message <[email protected]> on Mon, 04 
Apr 2016 15:59:03 +0200 (CEST), Richard Levitte <[email protected]> said:

levitte> In message 
<ae79948978484f9fbb27837e76414...@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> on Mon, 
4 Apr 2016 13:56:03 +0000, "Salz, Rich" <[email protected]> said:
levitte> 
levitte> rsalz> 
levitte> rsalz> > I think we're deleting all engine code from LibreSSL, but at 
least one hunk of
levitte> rsalz> > this diff is relevant to OpenSSL:
levitte> rsalz> > 
levitte> rsalz> > https://marc.info/?l=libressl&m=145791622313784&w=2
levitte> rsalz> 
levitte> rsalz> Thanks for forwarding this.  We removed 
crypto/engine/eng_padlock.c ... 
levitte> 
levitte> Not quite.
levitte> 
levitte> It was moved to engines/

That being said, engines/e_padlock.c has changed quite a bit since, so
if patching is still needed, it needs to be reworked with somewhat
more modern code (that libressl patch applies to OpenSSL 0.9.8, which
is past EOL).

Cheers,
Richard

-- 
Richard Levitte         [email protected]
OpenSSL Project         http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/
-- 
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Reply via email to