In message <rt-4.0.19-29510-1461590378-1354.4518-...@openssl.org> on Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:19:38 +0000, "Salz, Rich via RT" <r...@openssl.org> said:
rt> No, he means setting the same value twice. For example, making this change: rt> If (r=->n != n) BN_free(r->n); rt> If(r->e != e) BN_free(r->e); rt> If (r->d != d) BN_free(r->d); rt> rt> I agree it shouldn't happen, but do we want to protect against that? I could be convinced either way. Ah ok... sorry, I misread the intention. Agreed that we could make sure not to free the pointers in that case. Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4518 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
