Hi, > I'm aware it doesn't affect anything because the caller shouldn't process > more than 2^32 * 64 bytes per key/nonce setup anyway. > > I was just wondering because it differs from the s390 asm implementation > (and whether there is a particular reason to do so).
Implementation is harmonized with subroutine name now, case is being dismissed. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4512 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
