On 11/08/16 13:29, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: >> ( cd test; \ >> SRCTOP=../. \ >> BLDTOP=../. \ >> PERL="perl" \ >> EXE_EXT= \ >> OPENSSL_ENGINES=.././engines \ >> perl .././test/run_tests.pl test_afalg ) >> ../test/recipes/30-test_afalg.t .. >> 1..1 >> ALG_PERR: afalg_fin_cipher_aio: io_read failed : Bad address >> test_afalg_aes_128_cbc() failed encryption >> ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./afalgtest => 1 >> not ok 1 - running afalgtest >> >> # Failed test 'running afalgtest' >> # at ../test/recipes/30-test_afalg.t line 23. >> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 1. >> Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) >> Failed 1/1 subtests > > For reference, problem is not specific to x32, real x86 32-bit build > fails in same manner as well. [As well as executed under qemu-user, but > we are probably not in position to expect *that* work.] What's common > between x32 and x86 is that system calls pass an "emulation" layer where > 32-bit arguments are adjusted for 64-bit kernel and return values back > for 32-bit application... > >
Could be this: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1432 Matt -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4584 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev