I took a quick look through the new SSL test framework, which looks pretty good. I created this pull request to show what I currently propose:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Richard Levitte <levi...@openssl.org> wrote: > I think it makes more sense to extend the new SSL test framework... > > Cheers > Richard > > Bill Cox <waywardg...@gmail.com> skrev: (5 september 2016 19:14:22 CEST) > >I wrote a simple change to custom extensions so that they can be > >negotiated > >on resume, which is needed by token binding. I put the test for this > >change in test/ssltest_old.c, which seems weird, but there are no > >custom > >extension tests in the new SSL tests AFAIK. Do we still extend the old > >tests when there are no equivalent new tests? > > > >Bill > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > -- > openssl-dev mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev >
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
