> It's not a huge step to support full blown ISO 8601 (which has a few more > alternatives to specify time intervals *). I like the idea.
No, it *is* a huge step. There's a reason why W3C XML schema language (XSD), not known for being lightweight, profiled the ISO standard. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev