> > > On 05/10/16 15:37, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 14:40 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >>> How's this for a start... >> >> Now I think I have it right for CCM too, although having to use >> strstr() for that makes me *very* sad. Next up, Chacha20-Poly1305... >> and then maybe I can stop worrying about new modes and ciphersuites >> because those won't be added in OpenSSL 1.1 and we can get OpenSSL do >> to this for itself before 1.2? :) > > Or even 1.1.1! Why don't you pull this together into a github PR?
Sure. Any thoughts on what you want it to look like? Not just SSL_CIPHER_get_overhead() because it'seems not constant -- you have to account for blocksize rounding and padding in CBC ciphers. So just SSL_CIPHER_get_data_mtu(int link_mtu)? Or are there other use cases we want it for, and we *should* try returning a full set of three "add this, round up to this, add this" integers? As for the actual numbers... am I on the right track so far? -- dwmw2 -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
