On 23 March 2017 at 18:04, Salz, Rich via openssl-dev < firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > The new license also conflicts with the GPLv2. This was immediately > brought > > up as a serious problem when this discussion began in July of 2015. It > > appears that the feedback that the APL does not solve these serious > > problems with how OpenSSL was licensed was ignored. Sad to see that. > > No it was not ignored. (Just because we disagree doesn't mean we ignore > the feedback.) The team felt that the Apache license better met our needs. > It's a fairly large elephant in the room that the press release does not address at all though. I think it's reasonable to expect some kind of reasoning. Cheers Rich.
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev