In message <20170324121435.gq70...@colo.drijf.net> on Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:14:35 +0100, Otto Moerbeek <o...@drijf.net> said:
otto> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:53:10AM +0000, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote: otto> otto> > I personally think this issue is being blown way out of proportion and beyond the boundary of reason. otto> > otto> > Regards, otto> > Uri otto> otto> Is it reasonable to step on the rights of authors with the backing of otto> large corporations? Individual authors that might have chosen to otto> change email address or are unable to be contacted for other reasons? otto> otto> It is sad to see the corporate giants dictate the policies of yet otto> another open source project, without regard for the spirit of otto> copyright law which is to protect the individual author. If I'm reading you correctly, *any* license change faces the exact same problem. My interpretation of what you say is that unless we can successfully reach all contributors, no exception, we're stuck with the current license, probably for life. Am I reading you correctly? -- Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
