On 26 June 2017 at 18:10, Salz, Rich via openssl-dev < openssl-dev@openssl.org> wrote:
> > Pseudorandomness of the output has been a design goal/requirement only > > in SHA-3 family. Any prior hash function’s exhibition of this property is > > coincidental. > > > > Therefore I suggest using SHA3 instead. > > Is pseudorandomness a requirement? Or is it the "50% chance of a bitflip"? > You are asking if a pseudorandom number generator requires pseudorandomness?
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
