On Mon, Oct 02, 2017, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > On 02/10/17 15:00, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote: > > Moving to openssl-dev, because I think OpenSSL-1.0.2 needs a fix. > > > > > > > > To be more specific, the following get methods are missing in 1.0.2: > > > > > > > > - EVP_PKEY_meth_get_sign(EVP_PKEY_METHOD *, ???) > > > > - EVP_PKEY_meth_get_decrypt(EVP_PKEY_METHOD *, ???) > > > > - EVP_PKEY_meth_get_encrypt(EVP_PKEY_METHOD *, ???) > > > > > > > > Note that the corresponding set methods are (thankfully) already present: > > > > > > > > - EVP_PKEY_meth_set_sign(EVP_PKEY_METHOD *, ???) > > > > - EVP_PKEY_meth_set_decrypt(EVP_PKEY_METHOD *, ???) > > > > - EVP_PKEY_meth_set_encrypt(EVP_PKEY_METHOD *, ???) > > > > > > > > Can I hope that these get methods would be added? Maybe even soon? > > Normally we don't add new features/functions to a stable release. > However our policy for 1.1.0 (which obviously made lots of structures > opaque), is that missing accessors are considered a bug - and we do add > those. The situation is less clear for 1.0.2 since most structures are > not opaque and we did not make wholesale opacity changes for that release. > > If we had a PR to add them it might spur the discussion about whether > adding these is valid for 1.0.2 or not to a conclusion!! Fancy creating one? >
Personally I'm in favour of adding these to 1.0.2, that structure has always been opaque. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
