On 30/01/18 14:27, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > It seems that we've started getting issues with a single build > configuration, e.g., > https://travis-ci.org/openssl/openssl/jobs/335110257 > > Lots of complaints about alignment, like: > > crypto/modes/gcm128.c:1090:36: runtime error: load of misaligned > address 0x000002350ce5 for type 'const size_t' (aka 'const unsigned > long'), which requires 8 byte alignment > 0x000002350ce5: note: pointer points here > 68 1f ea 3b 14 00 00 0c 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 0c a3 35 89 7d a7 5e 9e 87 > fa d7 fd 8b c7 34 8a 8d > ^ > I didn't see anything particularly special about that configuration > on a quick once-over; any ideas?
I raised an issue on this with some of my thoughts and investigation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/5203 The error message about unsigned int requiring 8 byte alignment seems suspicious to me. Shouldn't it be 4? Matt _______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
