>>> I'd like to request more opinions on >>> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5427. Key dispute question is >>> whether or not following fragment should work >>> >>> unsigned char *inp = buf, *out = buf; >>> >>> for (i = 0; i < sizeof(buf); i++) { >>> EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, out, &outl, inp++, 1); >>> out += outl; >>> } >> >> This should work. > > On second thought, perhaps not.
It seems that double-clarification is appropriate. As it stands now it *does* work. So question is rather if it should keep working [and if not, is it appropriate that stops working in minor release]. _______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
